Dr. Hassan Hamdan

I think of regenerative work as supporting the skin's own repair rather than overriding it, so my starting point is always the assessment — what the skin actually needs, and whether a regenerative approach is the right tool at all. These treatments tend to reward patience: the changes are gradual and structural, not instant, so I set honest expectations and review the skin between steps. Where it fits, I prefer to combine a regenerative modality with good day-to-day skincare rather than rely on it alone.

I treat NAD+ as one input within a longevity plan, not a standalone fix. We start with your history, set the dose conservatively, and give the infusion slowly because the rate matters more than the total. I am candid about what the evidence does and does not show, and I would rather a patient understand that than expect a dramatic result.

Plasmapheresis is a procedure I approach conservatively. I want a clear clinical rationale before recommending it, and I prefer to set expectations plainly: it is performed under supervision, suitability is assessed individually, and it sits within a wider longevity plan rather than standing alone. If it is not the right option, I will say so.