Dr. Hassan Hamdan

I think of regenerative work as supporting the skin's own repair rather than overriding it, so my starting point is always the assessment — what the skin actually needs, and whether a regenerative approach is the right tool at all. These treatments tend to reward patience: the changes are gradual and structural, not instant, so I set honest expectations and review the skin between steps. Where it fits, I prefer to combine a regenerative modality with good day-to-day skincare rather than rely on it alone.

I treat NAD+ as one input within a longevity plan, not a standalone fix. We start with your history, set the dose conservatively, and give the infusion slowly because the rate matters more than the total. I am candid about what the evidence does and does not show, and I would rather a patient understand that than expect a dramatic result.

I treat IHHT as a supervised, supportive option rather than a standalone fix — the value is in the structure and the monitoring. For most people it works best as part of a wider longevity plan, run as a planned course rather than a single session, with readings reviewed each time so we adjust the intervals to how the body is responding. We screen carefully beforehand, and if it is not appropriate for you I will say so.